Social Media

romney_media

In 2007 and 2008, during the emergence of social media, I covered the presidential campaign for the Talk Radio News Service. Tomorrow I depart for a few weeks on the road covering the 2012 campaign. Some of my time  - particularly early in the primary process – will be spent creating content independently for the [...]

{ 0 comments }

A chat with Loren Feldman on Google Plus and the social web (and Brooklyn).

{ 0 comments }

{ 0 comments }

The New York Times Magazine 05.22.11">Bill Keller, The New York Times Magazine 05.22.11

by Dan Patterson on May 18, 2011 · 0 comments

in Blog

…My inner worrywart wonders whether the new technologies overtaking us may be eroding characteristics that are essentially human: our ability to reflect, our pursuit of meaning, genuine empathy, a sense of community connected by something deeper than snark or political affinity.

{ 0 comments }

This is a serious question.  Pre-social media/Tumblr/Twitter/Facebook/et al – how did you spend your time?  On what did you burn your creative energy?  

{ 0 comments }

Howard Stern – @Biz Stone on Howard Stern Twitter co-founder @Biz Stone interviewed yesterday on the Howard Stern show.

{ 0 comments }

The Beginning of the End

{ 0 comments }

Disruptive Pivoting and Viral Synergies

I’m at Disruptive Pivoting and Viral Synergies (New York, NY) “OMG I’m full of teh socialz! And mediaz! And hyper-local check-inz!” Follow me on Gowalla  

{ 0 comments }

creepysleepy:
/via @mashable
Politicians are brands. Like their counterparts in the private sector, we’ve seen some pretty interesting things when it comes to using social media on the campaign trail. Representative democracy seems the perfect place for social media — a direct communications channel between the governed and the government. But are we headed toward a more interconnected body politic, or a new sea of unmanageable political noise? With the U.S. midterm elections in their final throes, we spoke to some key players for their views on what the rise of mainstream social media has in store for the next generation of political campaigns…
Keep Reading on Mashable
">/via @creepysleepy:
/via @mashable
Politicians are brands. Like their counterparts in the private sector, we’ve seen some pretty interesting things when it comes to using social media on the campaign trail. Representative democracy seems the perfect place for social media — a direct communications channel between the governed and the government. But are we headed toward a more interconnected body politic, or a new sea of unmanageable political noise? With the U.S. midterm elections in their final throes, we spoke to some key players for their views on what the rise of mainstream social media has in store for the next generation of political campaigns…
Keep Reading on Mashable

by Dan Patterson on November 1, 2010 · 0 comments

in Blog

The Future of Social Media and Politics

{ 0 comments }

Read More">The world, we are told, is in the midst of a revolution. The new tools of social media have reinvented social activism. With Facebook and Twitter and the like, the traditional relationship between political authority and popular will has been upended, making it easier for the powerless to collaborate, coördinate, and give voice to their concerns. When ten thousand protesters took to the streets in Moldova in the spring of 2009 to protest against their country’s Communist government, the action was dubbed the Twitter Revolution, because of the means by which the demonstrators had been brought together. A few months after that, when student protests rocked Tehran, the State Department took the unusual step of asking Twitter to suspend scheduled maintenance of its Web site, because the Administration didn’t want such a critical organizing tool out of service at the height of the demonstrations. “Without Twitter the people of Iran would not have felt empowered and confident to stand up for freedom and democracy,” Mark Pfeifle, a former national-security adviser, later wrote, calling for Twitter to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. Where activists were once defined by their causes, they are now defined by their tools. Facebook warriors go online to push for change. “You are the best hope for us all,” James K. Glassman, a former senior State Department official, told a crowd of cyber activists at a recent conference sponsored by Facebook, A. T. & T., Howcast, MTV, and Google. Sites like Facebook, Glassman said, “give the U.S. a significant competitive advantage over terrorists. Some time ago, I said that Al Qaeda was ‘eating our lunch on the Internet.’ That is no longer the case. Al Qaeda is stuck in Web 1.0. The Internet is now about interactivity and conversation.” These are strong, and puzzling, claims. Why does it matter who is eating whose lunch on the Internet? Are people who log on to their Facebook page really the best hope for us all? Read More

by Dan Patterson on September 27, 2010 · 0 comments

in Blog

Gladwell: Small Change – Why the Revolution will not be Tweeted.

{ 0 comments }

Read More">The world, we are told, is in the midst of a revolution. The new tools of social media have reinvented social activism. With Facebook and Twitter and the like, the traditional relationship between political authority and popular will has been upended, making it easier for the powerless to collaborate, coördinate, and give voice to their concerns. When ten thousand protesters took to the streets in Moldova in the spring of 2009 to protest against their country’s Communist government, the action was dubbed the Twitter Revolution, because of the means by which the demonstrators had been brought together. A few months after that, when student protests rocked Tehran, the State Department took the unusual step of asking Twitter to suspend scheduled maintenance of its Web site, because the Administration didn’t want such a critical organizing tool out of service at the height of the demonstrations. “Without Twitter the people of Iran would not have felt empowered and confident to stand up for freedom and democracy,” Mark Pfeifle, a former national-security adviser, later wrote, calling for Twitter to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. Where activists were once defined by their causes, they are now defined by their tools. Facebook warriors go online to push for change. “You are the best hope for us all,” James K. Glassman, a former senior State Department official, told a crowd of cyber activists at a recent conference sponsored by Facebook, A. T. & T., Howcast, MTV, and Google. Sites like Facebook, Glassman said, “give the U.S. a significant competitive advantage over terrorists. Some time ago, I said that Al Qaeda was ‘eating our lunch on the Internet.’ That is no longer the case. Al Qaeda is stuck in Web 1.0. The Internet is now about interactivity and conversation.” These are strong, and puzzling, claims. Why does it matter who is eating whose lunch on the Internet? Are people who log on to their Facebook page really the best hope for us all? Read More

by Dan Patterson on September 27, 2010 · 0 comments

in Blog

Gladwell: Small Change – Why the Revolution will not be Tweeted.

{ 0 comments }

Revelation

by Dan Patterson on August 27, 2010 · 0 comments

in Blog

Tumblr is such a wonderful ‘fuck you’ to so-called social media.    Thanks, yo.

{ 0 comments }

http://abcnews.go.com/assets/player/walt2.6/flash/SFP_Walt.swf An interesting conversation via @abcnewsradio on North Korea’s identity crisis when it comes to emerging technologies and social media.  From @ABC News: The Conversation: Social Media and North Korea Vice founder Shane Smith and Stephanie Sy on North Korea’s social media push.

{ 0 comments }

http://abcnews.go.com/assets/player/walt2.6/flash/SFP_Walt.swf An interesting conversation via @abcnewsradio on North Korea’s identity crisis when it comes to emerging technologies and social media.  From @ABC News: The Conversation: Social Media and North Korea Vice founder Shane Smith and Stephanie Sy on North Korea’s social media push.

{ 0 comments }

Social Media FAIL

Dan Patterson – Social Media FAIL? Social Media Fail – The Audience (not the Medium) is the Message In a post entitled ‘Buzz Kill’ Leo Laporte of TWiT recently blogged about the ‘failure’ of Google Buzz and Twitter.  He states: “Last night I noticed that my Buzzes were no longer showing up on Twitter (I use a [...]

{ 0 comments }